Summary:
Pregnant worker denied remote work due to COVID-19 concerns.
EEOC files federal discrimination lawsuit against the Support Center for Child Advocates.
Seitz alleged disparate treatment compared to other employees.
The organization mandated three days in-office work despite health risks.
EEOC seeks backpay and changes to employment practices.
Overview
When a pregnant Philadelphia social worker, Meghan Seitz, requested to work remotely in early 2022 due to concerns about COVID-19 exposure, her request was denied. This led to a federal employment discrimination lawsuit against her employer, the Support Center for Child Advocates.
The Lawsuit
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has taken action against the nonprofit on behalf of Seitz. Despite her requests for an exception to the organization’s in-office work requirement during a surge of COVID-19 infections, the organization mandated that employees report to the office three days a week.
Disparate Treatment
Seitz’s requests were denied, even after she left the job, while another employee was allowed to work remotely for non-pregnancy medical reasons. This raises questions about discrimination based on pregnancy status.
Timeline of Events
- December 2021: Seitz learns she is pregnant and begins requesting remote work due to her high-risk pregnancy.
- February 2022: The organization implements a three-day in-office requirement, ignoring her initial requests.
- Seitz continues to seek remote work, providing doctors' notes about her health risks, but her requests are met with no action or requests for more specificity.
- March 2022: After two weeks without a response to her final request, Seitz resigns, fearing for her health and that of her baby.
Allegations of Unequal Treatment
While Seitz faced continual denial, another social worker with an immunocompromised condition was permitted to work from home, highlighting a discrepancy in how requests were handled.
Seeking Justice
The EEOC is pursuing backpay and lost benefits for Seitz, along with an order for the nonprofit to change its employment practices. The commission attempted to negotiate a resolution with the organization before filing the lawsuit, which is standard in such cases.
Lack of Response
As of the latest updates, the organization’s board president and executive director have not commented on the ongoing situation.
Comments
Join Our Community
Create an account to share your thoughts, engage with others, and be part of our growing community.